The only way to locate and destroy with complete certainty all components of North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme is through a ground invasion, the Pentagon has said.
The blunt assessment came to light in response to a letter from two Democratic congressmen asking about casualty assessments in a conflict with North Korea.
Rear Admiral Michael J Dumont of the Joint Staff offered the assessment in response to a letter from Representatives Ted Lieu of California and Ruben Gallego of Arizona.
Mr Dumont noted the US is evaluating North Korea’s ability to target heavily-populated areas of South Korea with long-range artillery, rockets and ballistic missiles.
He also pointed out that Seoul, the South’s capital with a population of 25 million, is just 35 miles from the demilitarised zone.
Here are links to Joint Chiefs letter & CRS report that show 300,000 could die in first few days of war with N Korea https://t.co/Gv3Q5B4YfF
— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) November 5, 2017
The amount of casualties would differ depending on the advance warning and the ability of US and South Korean forces to counter these attacks, he said.
“A classified briefing would be the best place to discuss in detail the capability of the US and its allies to discuss capabilities to counter North Korea’s ability to respond with a nuclear weapon and eliminate North Korea’s nuclear weapons located in deeply buried, underground facilities,” he said.
Military officials would be happy to join “the intelligence community to address these issues in a classified briefing,” he said.
In a joint statement issued on Saturday, 15 Democratic politicians and one Republican – all military veterans – called the assessment that a ground invasion would be required to destroy the North’s nuclear arsenal “deeply disturbing” and that such an action “could result in hundreds of thousands, or even millions of deaths in just the first few days of fighting”.
“It is our intent to have a full public accounting of the potential cost of war, so the American people understand the commitment we would be making as a nation if we were to pursue military action,” they said.
They also said the Trump administration “has failed to articulate any plans to prevent the military conflict from expanding beyond the Korean Peninsula and to manage what happens after the conflict is over”.
“With that in mind, the thought of sending troops into harm’s way and expending resources on another potentially unwinnable war is chilling.
“The president needs to stop making provocative statements that hinder diplomatic options and put American troops further at risk,” they said.
