An audio recording has been released of the drill the US state of Hawaii was running in January when an employee mistakenly sent mobile phone and broadcast alerts warning of a ballistic missile attack.
But the 24-second recording the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency released was heavily redacted.
It started with the words “exercise, exercise, exercise”, followed by a prolonged beep, then the phrase “this is not a drill” and another prolonged beep. It ended with “exercise, exercise, exercise”.
“Somebody could use that verbiage to compose a message then call the state warning point and try to spoof the state warning point into thinking there was a real missile alert,” Lt Col Anthony said.
He said this could be a prankster, North Korea or “something in between”.
The recording is not classified, but the material is so sensitive that the emergency management agency treats it like it is, he said.
But Brian Black, the executive director of the Civil Beat Law Centre for the Public Interest, said it is troubling that the agency is only releasing portions that support their narrative of what happened.
The employee who sent the alert has said he did not hear the word “exercise” spoken during the drill and thought the threat was real. The agency has since fired him.
“The level of public disagreement about this issue raises the interest in this such that they really should have come forward with more and they really should have been more forthcoming about what it was that happened,” Mr Black said.
Mr Black said it sounds like the agency is saying it has no way of verifying the message is coming from Pacific Command other than the language that is being used.
The agency’s action on January 13 sent alerts to the mobile phones of thousands of Hawaii residents and visitors. Many panicked, fearing they were about to die in a nuclear attack.
It took the agency 38 minutes to send another phone and broadcast message notifying the public the alert was sent in error.
Ralph Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum CSIS think tank in Honolulu, said he understands the state’s need to be cautious and is “quasi-sympathetic” to its position on the redactions.
“You don’t want your procedures so clearly spelled out that somebody who could hack in the future could duplicate it and send out a very realistic message that could then create panic once again,” he said.
There are people “both capable and inclined” to do such things today, he added.
“On the other hand, if that’s all they put out, it certainly will raise more suspicions than it will answer questions,” he said.
Mr Cossa said he hopes there would be procedures in place to verify future messages from the Pacific Command and the messages would adopt some new wording.