From Keith Shaw.
THE report regarding the alleged high volume of noise coming from St Ouen’s Manor (JEP, 30 October) was quite alarming regarding the reported comments from three politicians.
The Chief Minister, Senator Frank Walker’s, ‘heavy handedness’ comment was inappropriate as I doubt if the abatement notice was the first contact with the event organisers. The Health Minister’s suggestion that appeals be heard by the minister is equally inappropriate as justice may not be visible or consistent.
Deputy Le Claire’s comment is naïve as no judgment has to be done. All the offices of the Health Protection Department need to do is monitor and record pre-calibrated equipment. The question raised by the Deputy re that as the Seigneur was due to leave the Island why was the notice served, is largely irrelevant also, as I doubt if the Seigneur controls the amplification or attends the event. He is the landlord.
The most serious question has to be asked of Senator Shenton. Why did he instruct his officers not to issue the abatement order and on what grounds? The Chief Minister’s comment that events had been taking place in the same place for about 20 years is even more irrelevant as is his reported remark that this was ‘well before the property owner moved into his home’.
I think all three politicians need to read up the laws on nuisance quickly and I would suggest they look back at old copies of the JEP for issues relating to noise. These include dog kennels at St Brelade, a pub in St Peter and a recycling yard in Trinity.
Why do the politicians think that the Health Protection team monitor the events at Elizabeth Castle and Jersey Live? Unwanted noise can be a nuisance. Noise at certain levels can be dangerous.
Cleveland House,
Cleveland Road,
St Helier.
